Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC)

Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC)

One-liner: The framework that ensures an organization manages security through policies (Governance), threat mitigation (Risk), and regulatory adherence (Compliance).

🎯 What Is It?

GRC is the unified approach to managing three interconnected pillars that keep organizations secure, compliant, and resilient:

  1. Governance — Policies, procedures, and oversight structures
  2. Risk Management — Identifying, assessing, and mitigating threats
  3. Compliance — Meeting legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations

Why it matters: Organizations face lawsuits, fines, and reputational damage without GRC—plus they can't prove due diligence to auditors or insurers.

📊 The Three Pillars

Pillar Focus Outputs Example
Governance How we manage security Policies, standards, committees CISO reports to board quarterly
Risk What threats we face Risk register, treatment plans Ransomware = Critical risk, mitigate via backups
Compliance What rules we follow Audit reports, certifications Achieve SOC 2 Type II certification

How They Connect

Governance defines policies
         ↓
Risk identifies threats to those policies
         ↓
Compliance validates you're following policies
         ↓
Governance updates policies based on findings
         (repeat)

🏛️ Governance Deep Dive

Key Components

Governance in Action

Board of Directors
    ↓
CISO (Chief Information Security Officer)
    ↓
Security Steering Committee
    ↓
├── Policy Team (creates policies)
├── Risk Team (manages threats)
└── Compliance Team (validates adherence)

⚠️ Risk Management Deep Dive

Risk Assessment Process

1. Identify assets → What needs protecting?
2. Identify threats → Ransomware, insider threat, DDoS
3. Assess vulnerabilities → Unpatched systems, weak passwords
4. Calculate risk → Likelihood × Impact = Risk Score
5. Treat risk → Accept, mitigate, transfer, avoid

Risk Treatment Options

Strategy Definition Example
Mitigate Reduce likelihood or impact Deploy EDR to reduce malware impact
Accept Acknowledge risk, do nothing Legacy system with low criticality
Transfer Shift risk to third party Cyber insurance, cloud provider SLA
Avoid Eliminate the activity Don't process credit cards (avoid PCI-DSS)

Risk Matrix

           LIKELIHOOD
         Low   Med   High
High    [🟡] [🟠] [🔴]   ← Critical: Immediate action
Impact
Medium  [🟢] [🟡] [🟠]   ← High: Prioritize mitigation
Low     [🟢] [🟢] [🟡]   ← Medium: Monitor and plan

✅ Compliance Deep Dive

Common Frameworks

Framework Industry Key Requirements
PCI-DSS Payment cards Encrypt card data, segment networks, quarterly scans
HIPAA Healthcare PHI encryption, access controls, breach notification
SOC 2 SaaS vendors Security, availability, confidentiality controls
ISO 27001 General 114 security controls, ISMS implementation
GDPR EU data Data privacy, right to be forgotten, consent
NIST 800-53 US Federal 1000+ controls for government systems
CMMC Defense contractors Maturity-based cybersecurity certification

Compliance Audit Workflow

1. Gap analysis → Compare current vs. required controls
2. Remediation → Implement missing controls
3. Evidence collection → Screenshots, logs, policies
4. Audit → External auditor validates controls
5. Certification → Receive compliance attestation
6. Continuous monitoring → Maintain compliance year-round

🛡️ GRC in Security Engineering

How Security Engineers Use GRC

Task Governance Role Risk Role Compliance Role
Deploy firewall Follow change mgmt policy Reduce external attack surface Meet PCI-DSS req 1.2
Patch vulnerability Per vuln mgmt procedure Mitigate CVE-2024-XXXX Satisfy quarterly scan requirement
Incident response Follow IR playbook Contain threat quickly Document for breach notification
Access review Least privilege policy Insider threat mitigation SOC 2 quarterly access audit

🎤 Interview Angles

Common Questions

STAR Story Template

Situation: Organization faced potential SOC 2 audit failure due to missing vulnerability management controls
Task: Lead GRC initiative to close gaps and achieve certification
Action: Implemented risk-based patching (governance policy), prioritized by CVSS score (risk management), documented evidence for auditors (compliance)
Result: Achieved SOC 2 Type II on first attempt, reduced critical vulns 85%, formalized security program

🛠️ GRC Tools

Category Tools Purpose
GRC Platforms ServiceNow GRC, RSA Archer, OneTrust Unified governance, risk, compliance mgmt
Risk Management RiskWatch, LogicGate, Resolver Risk registers, heat maps, treatment tracking
Compliance Vanta, Drata, Secureframe Automated SOC 2, ISO 27001 evidence collection
Policy Management PowerDMS, PolicyTech Centralized policy repository
Audit AuditBoard, Workiva Evidence management for audits

📋 GRC Maturity Levels

Level Characteristics Example Org
1 - Initial Ad-hoc, reactive, no documentation Startup, no formal security
2 - Developing Some policies exist, manual compliance Small business with spreadsheet tracking
3 - Defined Documented processes, periodic risk assessments Mid-size org with GRC tool
4 - Managed Metrics tracked, proactive risk mgmt Enterprise with dedicated GRC team
5 - Optimized Continuous improvement, automated monitoring Fortune 500 with integrated GRC

✅ Best Practices

❌ Common Misconceptions

🚨 GRC Failures

Failure Impact Example
No governance Inconsistent security decisions Every team makes up their own security rules
Ignored risk Exploited vulnerabilities Known critical vuln not patched → breached
Compliance theater False sense of security Pass audit but still get breached (weak passwords allowed)

📚 References